To illustrate outcomes of different studies and an overall mean, graphical presentations like flow charts or forest plots are available.
We applied these graphs in a review, where we analyzed the benefits of a pesticide by systematically reviewing the results of thousands of field studies.
But also in many other projects:
systematic review on the incubation period of infectious diseases
systematic literature review on interventions for tuberculosis prevention and control in inaccessible and vulnerable populations
review of literature on cyanobacteria toxins in food
occupational exposure and arthritis of the hip
social working relations
health and environmental effects of pesticides
scoping review: effectiveness of training programs in organizations
food and feed safety aspects of novel food products
biological variability of potato tuber components
relevance and data extraction of studies related to the toxicity of dioxins in experimental animals and humans
scoping review: absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion and systemic / target organ exposure potential of dsRNA following oral, inhalation, or dermal exposures
scoping review: international recommendations and guidelines for the prevention of tobacco use and promotion of non-smoking
scoping review: international scientifically sound nutritional recommendations
scoping review: enzymes from bacterial, fungal and archaeal sources used in industrial areas
literature review: methodological approaches to the analysis of trends in air quality
In projects where meta-analyses are performed, we use Forest Plots to very clearly summarize almost all results of a review.
A forest plot is a graphical representation of a meta- analysis.
It is accompanied by a table listing elements (endpoints, studies) included in the meta-analysis.